Expert Review Logo
Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
Summary
May 2007, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pages 349-359 , DOI 10.1586/17434440.4.3.349
(doi:10.1586/17434440.4.3.349)

Review
Demands and properties of alloplastic implants for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
Uwe Klinge, Marcel Binneboesel, Stefanie Kuschel and Bernhard Schuessler
Author for correspondence



Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence changed dramatically with the introduction of the tension-free vaginal tape. Owing to its high efficacy and minimal patient discomfort this new minimally invasive procedure quickly obtained widespread acceptance and superseded the abdominal colposuspension as the gold standard. In the course of success of the original method a number of tension-free vaginal tapes flooded the market, varying in approach and material. These variations may strongly influence the safety, efficacy and long-term results of tension-free vaginal tape and its major modification, the transobturator technique. Therefore, it is the aim of this review to closely illuminate available materials and complications associated with this procedure. An extensive Medline search of the published literature up until 2006 on the subject of stress urinary incontinence was carried out. All sources identified were reviewed with particular attention to the method applied, the properties of the mesh materials and clinical complications. Apart from several technical variations, there are marked differences between the different vaginal sling materials, ranging from absorbable collagens over polypropylene to allografts. Although performed globally in substantial and increasing numbers, minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence are lacking sufficient safety data.

Full Text PDF (221 KB) PDF Plus (327 KB)

Users who read this article also read:

Stress urinary incontinence: the evolution of the sling
Elizabeth R Williams, Carl G Klutke
Expert Review of Medical Devices, Jul 2008, Vol. 5, No. 4, Pages 507-523.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (901 KB) | PDF Plus (930 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Postoperative Crohn’s disease: prevention and treatment
Sandra El-Hachem, Miguel Regueiro
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Jun 2009, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pages 249-256.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (331 KB) | PDF Plus (407 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 Hernia recurrence after laparotomy: how to close an incised light-weight mesh?
Jörg Höer, Christian Roesel, Alexander Schachtrupp, Christian Töns
Expert Review of Medical Devices, Nov 2008, Vol. 5, No. 6, Pages 687-689.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (819 KB) | PDF Plus (843 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 Vaginal mesh for incontinence and/or prolapse: caution required!
Ginger Isom-Batz, Philippe E Zimmern
Expert Review of Medical Devices, Sep 2007, Vol. 4, No. 5, Pages 675-679.
Citation | Full Text | PDF (242 KB) | PDF Plus (250 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (221 KB)
View PDF Plus (327 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Uwe Klinge
Marcel Binneboesel
Stefanie Kuschel
Bernhard Schuessler
Keywords:
erosion
mesh
polypropylene
polytetrafluoroethylene
polyvinylidenfluoride
protrusion
stress urinary incontinence
tension free
transobturator tape/sling
transvaginal tape/sling


Expert Reviews Ltd, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK
Business Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6080 · Fax +44 (0)20 8371 6099 
Editorial Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6090 · Fax +44 (0)20 8343 2313
We welcome your Feedback. See our Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions.