Expert Review Logo
Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
Summary
October 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 731-746 , DOI 10.1586/14789450.5.5.731
(doi:10.1586/14789450.5.5.731)

Review
Proteome and peptidome profiling of spider venoms
Songping Liang



Spider venoms are an important source of novel molecules with different pharmacological properties. Recent technological developments of proteomics, especially mass spectrometry, have greatly promoted the systematic analysis of spider venom. The enormous diversity of venom components between spider species and the lack of complete genome sequence, and the limited database of protein and peptide sequences make spider venom profiling a challenging task and special considerations for technical strategies are required. This review highlights recently used methods for spider venom profiling. In general, spider venom profiling can be achieved in two parts: proteome profiling of the components with molecular weights above 10 kDa, and peptidome profiling of the components with a molecular weight of 10 kDa or under through the use of different methods. Venom proteomes are rich in various enzymes, hemocyanins, toxin-like proteins and many unknown proteins. Peptidomes are dominated by peptides with a mass of 3–6 kDa with three to five disulfide bonds. Although there are some similarities in peptide superfamily types of venoms from different spider species, the venom profile of each species is unique. The linkage of the peptidomic data with that of the cDNA approach is discussed briefly. Future challenges and perspectives are also highlighted in this review.

Full Text PDF (2805 KB) PDF Plus (2048 KB)

Users who read this article also read:

Mass spectrometry-based neurochemical analysis: perspectives for primate research
Xiaozhe Zhang, Alexander Rauch, Hongbin Xiao, Gregor Rainer, Nikos K Logothetis
Expert Review of Proteomics, Oct 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 641-652.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (483 KB) | PDF Plus (520 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Proteomics technologies in endometriosis
Simone Ferrero, David John Gillott, Valentino Remorgida, Nicola Ragni, Pier Luigi Venturini, Jurgis Gedis Grudzinskas
Expert Review of Proteomics, Oct 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 705-714.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (1047 KB) | PDF Plus (1036 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Activity-based probes as a tool for functional proteomic analysis of proteases
Marko Fonović, Matthew Bogyo
Expert Review of Proteomics, Oct 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 721-730.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (977 KB) | PDF Plus (1028 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 What can mitochondrial proteomics tell us about cardioprotection afforded by preconditioning?
D Brian Foster, Brian O’Rourke, Jennifer E Van Eyk
Expert Review of Proteomics, Oct 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 633-636.
Citation | Full Text | PDF (525 KB) | PDF Plus (570 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (2805 KB)
View PDF Plus (2048 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Author:
Songping Liang
Keywords:
peptidomics
proteomics
spider venom


Expert Reviews Ltd, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK
Business Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6080 · Fax +44 (0)20 8371 6099 
Editorial Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6090 · Fax +44 (0)20 8343 2313
We welcome your Feedback. See our Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions.