|
Summary
August 2007, Vol. 5, No. 4, Pages 653-663
, DOI 10.1586/14787210.5.4.653
(doi:10.1586/14787210.5.4.653)
Review Treatment and prevention of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection and hemolytic uremic syndrome Paul N Goldwater Over a quarter century after the discovery of verocytotoxin and the first report by Karmali and colleagues of cases of postdiarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) caused by verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC), otherwise known as Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC), successful treatment of these infections has remained elusive. This is because the pathological insult producing the clinical picture of HUS occurs early in the disease process and curtails quickly, making treatment intervention a largely vain hope. Nevertheless, understanding of the pathogenesis of HUS has expanded and, as a result, we can expect a future breakthrough in the treatment of this life-threatening condition. This review examines the pathogenesis of HUS and explores targets for treatment, including the reasons why certain therapies have failed and why future therapies could be successful. This review also examines the status of vaccine development in prevention of VTEC/STEC disease.
Cited byFahima Khan, François Proulx, Clifford A Lingwood. (2009) Detergent-resistant globotriaosyl ceramide may define verotoxin/glomeruli-restricted hemolytic uremic syndrome pathology. Kidney International 75:11, 1209-1216 Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. CrossRef Quanshun Zhang, Arthur Donohue‐Rolfe, Greice Krautz‐Peterson, Milica Sevo, Nicola Parry, Claudia Abeijon, Saul Tzipori. (2009) Gnotobiotic Piglet Infection Model for Evaluating the Safe Use of Antibiotics against
Escherichia coli
O157:H7 Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 199:4, 486-493 Online publication date: 15-Mar-2009. CrossRef Martin Bitzan. (2009) Treatment options for HUS secondary to Escherichia coli O157:H7. Kidney International 75, S62-S66 Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009. CrossRef
|
|
|