Expert Review Logo
Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
Summary
July 2008, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 579-587 , DOI 10.1586/14760584.7.5.579
(doi:10.1586/14760584.7.5.579)

Review
Yellow fever vaccines and international travelers
Elizabeth D Barnett, Annelies Wilder-Smith and Mary E Wilson
Author for correspondence



The growth of air travel has diminished the barriers to the spread of yellow fever, posing a threat to regions that have not previously been reached by the disease but are considered receptive, including the Middle East, coastal East Africa, the Indian subcontinent, Asia and Australia. For many decades, vaccination against yellow fever has been required for travelers entering many countries with receptive mosquito vectors in order to prevent the importation of yellow fever virus from a country that had ongoing transmission. Each year, approximately 9 million tourists travel to countries where yellow fever is endemic; the number of tourists who visit yellow fever-endemic regions within these countries may exceed 3 million. Risk estimates of yellow fever to travelers are extremely difficult to ascertain due to fluctuation of the disease by year and season, incomplete surveillance data, and lack of accurate data regarding vaccine coverage of the local population. The 17D live yellow fever vaccine has been widely acknowledged as one of the most effective and safe vaccines in use. Recently, however, reports of severe and previously unrecognized significant adverse events linked to the 17D vaccine have caused major concern. Some have called for the development of new inactivated yellow fever vaccines for travelers. A new approach for manufacturing the live 17D vaccine involves using a full-length cDNA clone of 17D-204 virus. This new method allows production in a cell culture system and potentially reduces the risk of adventitious viruses and selection of a subpopulation during replication, thereby increasing safety.

Full Text PDF (395 KB) PDF Plus (405 KB)

Users who read this article also read:

 Travel vaccines: current practice and future aspects
David R Hill, Annelies Wilder-Smith
Expert Review of Vaccines, Jul 2008, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 527-530.
Citation | Full Text | PDF (345 KB) | PDF Plus (360 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Hepatitis A vaccines
Hans Dieter Nothdurft
Expert Review of Vaccines, Jul 2008, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 535-545.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (696 KB) | PDF Plus (718 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Vaccination and immunization against travel-related diseases in immunocompromised hosts
Camille Nelson Kotton
Expert Review of Vaccines, Jul 2008, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 663-672.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (281 KB) | PDF Plus (370 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Vaccination with Dukoral® against travelers’ diarrhea (ETEC) and cholera
Tomas Jelinek, Herwig Kollaritsch
Expert Review of Vaccines, Jul 2008, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 561-567.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (1250 KB) | PDF Plus (1294 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (395 KB)
View PDF Plus (405 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Elizabeth D Barnett
Annelies Wilder-Smith
Mary E Wilson
Keywords:
traveler
yellow fever
yellow fever vaccine
yellow fever vaccine-associated adverse event


Expert Reviews Ltd, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK
Business Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6080 · Fax +44 (0)20 8371 6099 
Editorial Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6090 · Fax +44 (0)20 8343 2313
We welcome your Feedback. See our Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions.