Expert Review Logo
Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
Summary
March 2007, Vol. 7, No. 2, Pages 117-131 , DOI 10.1586/14737159.7.2.117
(doi:10.1586/14737159.7.2.117)

Review
Multiple biomarkers in molecular oncology. I. Molecular diagnostics applications in cervical cancer detection
Douglas P Malinowski



The screening for cervical carcinoma and its malignant precursors (cervical neoplasia) currently employs morphology-based detection methods (Papanicolaou [Pap] smear) in addition to the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus. The combination of the Pap smear with human papillomavirus testing has achieved significant improvements in sensitivity for the detection of cervical disease. Diagnosis of cervical neoplasia is dependent upon histology assessment of cervical biopsy specimens. Attempts to improve the specificity of cervical disease screening have focused on the investigation of molecular biomarkers for adjunctive use in combination with the Pap smear. Active research into the genomic and proteomic alterations that occur during human papillomavirus-induced neoplastic transformation have begun to characterize some of the basic mechanisms inherent to the disease process of cervical cancer development. This research continues to demonstrate the complexity of multiple genomic and proteomic alterations that accumulate during the tumorigenesis process. Despite this diversity, basic patterns of uncontrolled signal transduction, cell cycle deregulation, activation of DNA replication and altered extracellular matrix interactions are beginning to emerge as common features inherent to cervical cancer development. Some of these gene or protein expression alterations have been investigated as potential biomarkers for screening and diagnostics applications. The contribution of multiple gene alterations in the development of cervical cancer suggests that the application of multiple biomarker panels has the potential to develop clinically useful molecular diagnostics. In this review, the application of biomarkers for the improvement of sensitivity and specificity of the detection of cervical neoplasia within cytology specimens will be discussed.

Full Text PDF (298 KB) PDF Plus (395 KB)

Cited by

Ben van Ommen, Jaap Keijer, Sandra G. Heil, Jim Kaput. (2009) Challenging homeostasis to define biomarkers for nutrition related health. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 53:7, 795-804
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
CrossRef
Ruba A. Halloush, Ilkser Akpolat, Qihui “Jim” Zhai, Mary R. Schwartz, Dina R. Mody. (2009) Comparison of ProEx C with p16INK4a and Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining of cell blocks prepared from residual liquid-based cervicovaginal material. Cancer 114:6, 474-480
Online publication date: 25-Jan-2009.
CrossRef
Janet S. Rader, James P. Malone, Julia Gross, Petra Gilmore, Rebecca A. Brooks, Loan Nguyen, Dan L. Crimmins, Sheng Feng, Jason D. Wright, Nicholas Taylor, Israel Zighelboim, Margo C. Funk, Phyllis C. Huettner, Jack H. Ladenson, David Gius, R. Reid Townsend. (2009) A unified sample preparation protocol for proteomic and genomic profiling of cervical swabs to identify biomarkers for cervical cancer screening. PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS 2:12, 1658-1669
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009.
CrossRef
Teri A. Longacre, Christina S. Kong, Mark L. Welton. (2008) Diagnostic Problems in Anal Pathology. Advances in Anatomic Pathology 15:5, 263-278
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008.
CrossRef
Riem E. Badr, Ann E. Walts, Fai Chung, Shikha Bose. (2008) BD ProEx C: A Sensitive and Specific Marker of HPV-associated Squamous Lesions of the Cervix. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 32:6, 899-906
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008.
CrossRef
Paula M. Mendes, Chun L. Yeung, Jon A. Preece. (2007) Bio-nanopatterning of Surfaces. Nanoscale Research Letters 2:8, 373-384
Online publication date: 8-Sep-2007.
CrossRef

Users who read this article also read:

Molecular profiling of cervical neoplasia
Cara M Martin, Katharine Astbury, John J O’Leary
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, Mar 2006, Vol. 6, No. 2, Pages 217-229.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (160 KB) | PDF Plus (295 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance
Andrea Endimiani, Federico Perez, Robert A Bonomo
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, Dec 2008, Vol. 6, No. 6, Pages 805-824.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (442 KB) | PDF Plus (536 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Proteomics technologies in endometriosis
Simone Ferrero, David John Gillott, Valentino Remorgida, Nicola Ragni, Pier Luigi Venturini, Jurgis Gedis Grudzinskas
Expert Review of Proteomics, Oct 2008, Vol. 5, No. 5, Pages 705-714.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (1047 KB) | PDF Plus (1036 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: new strains, new challenges
Ritu Banerjee, Gisela F Schecter, Jennifer Flood, Travis C Porco
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, Oct 2008, Vol. 6, No. 5, Pages 713-724.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (1194 KB) | PDF Plus (1233 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (298 KB)
View PDF Plus (395 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Author:
Douglas P Malinowski
Keywords:
biomarker
cervical neoplasia
clinical molecular diagnostics


Expert Reviews Ltd, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK
Business Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6080 · Fax +44 (0)20 8371 6099 
Editorial Office: Tel +44 (0)20 8371 6090 · Fax +44 (0)20 8343 2313
We welcome your Feedback. See our Privacy Statement and Terms and Conditions.